The New Attack Vectors Concerning Security Leaders
Gen AI is everywhere. Reports, code, emails, summaries. Employees are already using it,sometimes with permission, often without. Every prompt could be a security incident waiting to happen.
This isn’t like web filtering. It’s not endpoint protection. Gen AI creates a new attack surface that lives in language, context, and models. You can’t simply block ports or scan binaries and expect to be safe.
Every Gen AI prompt can be a security incident.
The Real Risks in Gen AI Security
The threat surface keeps expanding, and security leaders are already seeing where it breaks down:
Prompt injection. Attackers craft malicious inputs that trick the model into revealing sensitive details or performing unintended actions.
Data poisoning. Training or feedback data gets manipulated to alter how models behave.
Model theft and supply chain risks. Adversaries probe APIs, extract parameters, or compromise third-party models to insert backdoors.
AI-generated code vulnerabilities. Models generate insecure code that introduces new exploits.
Sensitive data leakage. Conversations containing PHI, PII, or trade secrets slip out of your perimeter.
Shadow AI. Teams adopt public AI tools without IT oversight. No logs. No visibility. Full exposure.
Bias and hallucinations. Outputs that are incorrect, fabricated, or discriminatory turn into compliance and reputational risks.
Traditional DLP solutions weren’t built for this. Regex filters flag credit card numbers but fail to catch semantic leaks or contextual disclosures.
What Gen AI Security Really Means
Gen AI security is about governing the entire lifecycle, not just blocking usage. A modern framework needs to address:
Input and output integrity. Sanitize prompts and filter risky responses in real time.
Data governance and protection. Encrypt, mask, and control access across training, fine-tuning, and inference pipelines.
Infrastructure hardening. Isolate workloads, enforce least privilege, and segment AI systems from general IT.
Model governance and accountability. Track lineage, monitor drift, and ensure explainability for every decision.
Adversarial defense. Test for prompt injection, poisoning, and anomaly behaviors before attackers exploit them.
This thinking aligns with Gartner’s AI TRiSM (Trust, Risk, and Security Management) model, which emphasizes that organizations must embed governance, trust, and security at every stage of AI adoption. Enterprises that fail to do so suffer costlier failures and slower adoption (Gartner: AI Trust and Risk).
Wald.ai’s Context Intelligence for Gen AI Security
At Wald, we focus on securing the conversation layer—the place where most of today’s risks actually begin.
Semantic redaction. Wald understands meaning, not just keywords. If someone types “our biggest client in California,” it recognizes and masks that before it reaches the LLM.
Inline real-time filtering. Redaction happens instantly, so employees see no friction and security sees no leakage.
Visibility into shadow AI. Every interaction with ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or Llama can be routed through Wald, giving CISOs the dashboards and logs they’ve been missing.
Compliance built-in. HIPAA, GDPR, SOC 2, and CCPA guardrails are enforced automatically, ensuring sensitive data never leaves.
Drawing from industry research and our experience, here are practices enterprises should adopt now:
Maintain an AI Bill of Materials (AI-BOM). Inventory all models, APIs, datasets, and tools. Shadow AI can’t hide if you know what exists.
Apply zero-trust principles. Enforce least privilege, continuous authentication, and workload isolation for AI systems.
Encrypt and tokenize sensitive data. Protect PHI, PII, and confidential business logic across every stage of AI use.
Operationalize governance. Build audit trails, bias detection, and explainability into AI pipelines.
Conduct adversarial testing. Simulate prompt injections, poisoning, and model drift before attackers exploit them.
Versioning and lineage tracking. Document how models evolve over time, enabling accountability and rollback.
User training. Employees need to know what not to paste into prompts. Security posture is only as strong as human behavior.
Incident response readiness. Build playbooks for leaks, compromised models, and anomalous outputs.
What Security Practitioners Are Saying About Gen AI Security
It’s not just vendors and analysts weighing in. On community forums like Reddit’s cybersecurity discussions, practitioners debate whether Gen AI can ever truly be secured.
Some voices argue:
Perfect security isn’t possible. Models are black boxes and inherently unpredictable.
Attackers will always adapt. Whatever defenses we build, adversaries will try to outsmart them.
Shadow AI is inevitable. Employees will continue to experiment with tools outside IT’s control.
Culture is the weakest link. Human behavior, not models, drives the riskiest exposures.
Others counter that while perfection isn’t realistic, practical guardrails—like context-aware redaction and strict governance—dramatically reduce exposure. The consensus? Gen AI security is about resilience, not absolutes.
By the time you discover a Gen AI data leak, it’s too late. Attack surfaces expand daily, and regulations are catching up fast.
With Wald.ai, security becomes an enabler. Teams move faster, compliance risks shrink, and leaders can finally say yes to AI adoption without caveats. But governance, policy, and people must move alongside technology. That’s how you stay in control while still embracing the future.
Secure Your Employee Conversations with AI Assistants
.png)
